A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out in between possible neighbours in excess of the development of a wall at a coastal internet site in a north Dublin suburb, a situation which has captivated countrywide focus subsequent an Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres over a proposed household property at Sutton Strand, the place allegations of planning breaches, environmental concerns, and long-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled into the courts. The Irish Situations article about René Collier as well as the Irish Periods report about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what began as a local disagreement has advanced into a hugely publicised authorized battle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing around development functions at the internet site on Dublin Road, Sutton, in which Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a physician and a firm director respectively, seek to develop their loved ones property. The case has become emblematic of broader disputes alongside Ireland’s coastline, where development pressures collide with environmental protections as well as the sensitivities of founded people. Based on the Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall being constructed by their potential neighbours goes further than the boundaries permitted underneath arranging permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both equally citizens of Dublin Highway, declare that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the phrases in their organizing authorization by creating a wall further than the boundaries of their web page, leading to an encroachment over a Particular Location of Conservation. The SAC designation is central to the dispute, as a result areas are matter to rigid controls less than European and Irish environmental regulation. Inside their courtroom filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even minimal encroachments could have Long lasting ecological repercussions, particularly in the sensitive coastal environment such as Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They are really in breach in their scheduling permission, and say the wall, that is partially crafted, is in the right situation. Their authorized team has characterised the action as an try to delay or frustrate a lawful development. The few accuse litigants of searching for to halt homebuilding in an effort to maintain their check out, an allegation that has been recurring in court docket and referenced in protection of the situation. This accusation goes to the heart of numerous coastal organizing disputes, wherever views of the sea are both remarkably prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained spectacular efforts through the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by ocean in storm to photograph the internet site, In keeping with sworn evidence referenced inside the Irish Times. In a single account, Rene Collier waded by midsection-higher drinking water during a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Periods, a picture that has since come to be emblematic in the depth of your dispute. These actions were not just symbolic; they had been meant to Collect Visible proof from the wall’s situation relative to tidal traces and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website within the sea Irish Times reported, describing how The 2 Guys entered the water for the duration of intense climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading as a result of storm h2o to photograph the internet site grew to become Among the most striking descriptions to arise from court reporting. The Irish Moments post about accountant Paul Feely pointed out that these actions have been cited to display the plaintiffs’ belief the wall extended into a location affected by tidal movement, strengthening their argument the SAC was being encroached upon.
The occasions at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 ended up lined in detail from the countrywide press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Moments 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Moments January 27 2026 grew to become widely searched phrases as visitors sought to know the track record and implications of the case. On that day, the High Court heard even further submissions on no matter whether interim orders needs to be granted to halt design pending a full hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a crucial second in the legal timeline.
At the core in the dispute is a disagreement over boundaries, scheduling compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely maintain that the wall, as built, goes over and above what was permitted and intrudes into safeguarded land. They argue that this is simply not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by profession, has been referred to as meticulous in his examination of organizing files, maps, and ailments attached into the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both equally stressed that their action is determined by issue for environmental safety and adherence to preparing legislation. They reject promises that the situation is about preserving A non-public perspective, insisting as a substitute that it's about ensuring that growth at Sutton Strand respects lawful and ecological boundaries. In affidavits, they've described their lengthy-standing link to the region and their consciousness of its environmental sensitivity.
On the opposite aspect, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed themselves as a few just seeking to produce a relatives household in accordance Along with the legislation. They deny which the wall encroaches over a Specific Region of Conservation and say that every one operates have been performed determined by Experienced advice and authorized programs. Their legal professionals have argued which the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and the dramatic steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, like entering the sea in the course of a storm, do not change the fundamental specifics.
The situation has also lifted broader questions about how preparing disputes are resolved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court dispute more than development of wall at coastal site is now a shorthand description for your problem that many observers see as increasingly typical. As sea levels increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the specific delineation amongst private land, public foreshore, and protected habitats is starting to become much more contentious.
The Irish Occasions article about René Collier observed that the businessman experienced Formerly been involved in regional advocacy on scheduling and environmental troubles, although not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Periods write-up about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how persons from really diverse Skilled backgrounds can discover them selves aligned in these types of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some experiences spell their names, have grown to be synonymous with the Sutton Strand situation.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site from your sea Irish Instances coverage emphasised, underlining the unusual lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded as a result of midsection-high water during a storm to photograph the Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 location Irish Occasions and René Collier waded by midsection-high drinking water in the course of a storm to photograph the website Irish Periods are phrases that appeared repeatedly in protection, reflecting each the Bodily fact in the coastline and also the symbolic mother nature on the act. For supporters of the plaintiffs, these steps demonstrated motivation; for critics, they illustrated what they see as an excessive technique.
As being the High Court proceedings continue on, the end result stays uncertain. The courtroom need to determine whether the wall as crafted complies with planning authorization and no matter if any encroachment right into a Exclusive Area of Conservation has occurred. The legal arguments are sophisticated, involving interpretation of maps, tidal info, and preparing situations. Nonetheless the human component remains central: neighbours who have to Stay together with each other prolonged after the authorized expenditures are already paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing about design will work at the location on Dublin Street, Sutton, even so the implications of the case extend outside of that deal with. For planners, builders, and people alike, the dispute serves like a reminder of the necessity of clarity in preparing permissions and sensitivity in coastal development. Additionally, it underscores how quickly a neighborhood disagreement can escalate when fundamental issues for example environmental security and assets legal rights are perceived to become at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand stays an area of pure splendor and contested boundaries. The wall with the centre on the dispute stands partially constructed, a Actual physical manifestation of unresolved authorized issues. Irrespective of whether it will ultimately be altered, taken out, or completed as prepared will depend upon the court’s results. Till then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variants will likely keep on to seem in headlines, joined indelibly to One of the more intently watched planning disputes in north Dublin recently.